Lessons Learned From the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model at an Academic Tertiary Center: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.

BACKGROUND: Our institution participated in the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model from 2016 to 2020. Here we review lessons learned from a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) care redesign at a tertiary academic center amid changing: (1) CJR rules; (2) inpatient only rules; and (3) outpatient trends. METHODS: Quality, financial, and patient demographic data from the years prior to and during participation in CJR were obtained from institutional and Medicare reconciled CJR performance data. RESULTS: Despite an increase in true outpatients and new challenges that arose from changing inpatient-only rules, there was significant improvement in quality metrics: decreased length of stay (3.48-1.52 days, P < .001), increased home discharge rate (70.2-85.5%, P < .001), decreased readmission rate (17.7%-5.1%, P < .001), decreased complication rate (6.5%-2.0%, P < .001), and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Composite Quality Score increased from 4.4 to 17.6. Over the five year period, CMS saved an estimated $8.3 million on 1,486 CJR cases, $7.5 million on 1,351 non-CJR cases, and $600,000 from the voluntary classification of 371 short-stay inpatients as outpatient-a total savings of $16.4 million. Despite major physician time and effort leading to marked improvements in efficiency, quality, and large cost savings for CMS, CJR participation resulted in a net penalty of $304,456 to our institution, leading to zero physician gainsharing opportunities. CONCLUSION: The benefits of CJR were tempered by malalignment of incentives among payer, hospital, and physician as well as a lack of transparency. Future payment models should be refined based on the successes and challenges of CJR.

Increased Reimbursement for Surgical Fixation of Hip Fractures: The Difference Between the Hospital and the Surgeon.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate trends and variations in hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments for surgical treatment of hip fractures in the US Medicare population. METHODS: Hospital and surgeon charges and payments after treatment of hip fractures by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), or intramedullary nail (IMN), along with corresponding patient demographics, 90-day and 1-year mortality, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and length of stay (LOS) from 2005 to 2014 were captured from the 5% Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The ratio of hospital to surgeon charges (CM: Charge Multiplier) and the ratio of hospital to surgeon payments (PM: Payment Multiplier) were calculated for each year and region of the United States and trended over time. Correlations between the CM and PM and LOS were evaluated using a Pearson correlation coefficient (r). RESULTS: Three thousand twenty-eight patients who underwent CRPP and 25,341 patients who underwent ORIF/IMN were included. The CM for CRPP increased from 10.1 to 15.6, P < 0.0001. The CM for ORIF/IMN increased from 11.9 to 17.2, P < 0.0001. The PM for CRPP increased from 15.1 to 19.2, P < 0.0001. The PM for ORIF/IMN increased from 11.5 to 17.4, P < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital charges and payments have continually increased relative to surgeon charges and payments for treatment of hip fractures despite decreasing LOS.

Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Have Increased for Hospitals but Not for Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: With increases in total hip arthroplasty procedures the need for revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) has increased as well. This study aims to analyze the trends in hospital charges and payments relative to corresponding surgeon charges and payments in a Medicare population for rTHA for aseptic revisions, stage 1 and stage 2 revisions. METHODS: The 5% Medicare sample database was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments related to 4449 patients undergoing aseptic revision, 517 for stage 1 revision, and 300 for stage 2 revision in between the years 2004 and 2014. Two values were calculated: (1) the ratio of hospital to surgeon charges (CM) and (2) the ratio of hospital to surgeon payments (PM). Year-to-year variation and trends in patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay (LOS), CM, and PM were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean CCI for aseptic revisions and stage 1 revisions did not significantly change (P < .088 and P < .063). The CCI slightly increased for stage 2 revisions (P < .04). The mean LOS decreased significantly over time in all 3 procedure types. The CM increased by 39% (P < .02) in aseptic revisions, 109% in stage 1 revisions (P < .001) but did not significantly change in stage 2 revisions (P < .877). PM for aseptic revisions increased around 103% (P < .001), 107% for stage 1 revisions (P < .001), and 9.7% for stage 2 revisions (P < .176). CONCLUSION: Hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments have increased substantially for THA aseptic revisions, stage 1 revisions, and stage 2 revisions despite stable patient complexity and decreasing LOS.

Trends in Hospital and Surgeon Charges and Reimbursements for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between surgeon and hospital charges and reimbursements for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been well examined. The objective of this study is to report trends and variations in hospital charges and payments compared to surgeons for stage 1 (S1) vs stage 2 (S2) septic revision TKA and aseptic revision (AR) TKA. METHODS: The 5% Medicare sample was used to capture hospital and surgeon data for revision TKA from 2005 to 2014. The charge multiplier (CM) and ratio of hospital to surgeon charges, and the payment multiplier (PM) and ratio of hospital to surgeon payments were calculated. Year-to-year variation and regional trends in-patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay (LOS), CM, and PM were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 4570 AR, 1323 S1, and 863 S2 TKA patients were included. CM increased for all cohorts: 8.1-13.8 for AR (P < .001), 21.0-22.5 (P = .07) for S1, and 11.8-22.0 (P < .001) for S2. PM followed a similar trend, increasing 8.1-13.8 (P < .001) for AR, 19.8-27.3 (P = .005) for S1, and 14.7-30.7 (P < .001) for S2. Surgeon reimbursement decreased for all cohorts. LOS decreased for AR (3.8-2.8 days), S1 (12.8-6.9 days), and S2 (4.5-3.9 days). Charlson Comorbidity Index remained stable for AR patients but increased significantly for S1 and S2 cohorts. CONCLUSION: Hospital charges and payments relative to the surgeons have significantly increased for revision TKA in the setting of stable or increasing patient complexity and decreasing LOS.

Hospital and Surgeon Reimbursement Trends for Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Hip Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The economic impact of hip fractures on the health care system continues to rise with continued pressure to reduce unnecessary costs while maintaining quality patient care. This study aimed to analyze the trend in hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments in a Medicare population for hip hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for femoral neck fracture. METHODS: The 5% Medicare sample database was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments related to 32,340 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty and 4323 patients who underwent THA for femoral neck fractures between 2005 and 2014. Two values were calculated: (1) charge multiplier (CM, ratio of hospital to surgeon charges), and (2) payment multiplier (PM, ratio of hospital to surgeon payments). Year-to-year variation and regional trends in patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), length of stay (LOS), 90-day and 1-year mortality, CM, and PM were evaluated. RESULTS: Hospital charges were significantly higher than surgeon charges and increased substantially for hemiarthroplasty (CM of 13.6 to 19.3, P < .0001) and THA (CM of 9.8 to 14.9, P = .0006). PM followed a similar trend for both hemiarthroplasty (14.9 to 20.2; P = .001) and THA (11.9 to 17.4; P < .0001). LOS decreased significantly for hemiarthroplasty (3.78 to 3.37d; P < .0001) despite increasing CCI (6.36 to 8.39; P = .018), whereas both LOS (3.71 to 3.79 days; P = .421) and CCI (5.34 to 7.08; P = .055) remained unchanged for THA. CONCLUSION: Hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments have increased substantially for hemiarthroplasty and THA performed for femoral neck fractures.

Surgeon Reimbursement Unchanged as Hospital Charges and Reimbursements Increase for Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing demands on physicians and hospitals to increase value and reduce unnecessary costs, reimbursement for healthcare services has been under downward pressure for several years. This study aimed to analyze the trend in hospital charges and payments relative to corresponding surgeon charges and payments in a Medicare population for total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The 5% Medicare sample database was used to capture hospital and surgeon charges and payments related to 56,228 patients who underwent primary THA and 117,698 patients who underwent primary TKA between 2005 and 2014. Two values were calculated: (1) the charge multiplier (CM), the ratio of hospital to surgeon charges and (2) the payment multiplier (PM), the ratio of hospital to surgeon payments. Year-to-year variation and regional trends in patient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, length of stay (LOS), CM, and PM were evaluated. RESULTS: Hospital charges were significantly higher than surgeon charges and increased substantially for both THA (CM increased from 8.7 to 11.5, P < .0001) and TKA (CM increased from 7.9 to 11.4, P < .0001). PM followed a similar trend, increasing for both THA and TKA (P < .0001). LOS decreased significantly for both THA and TKA (P < .0001), while Charlson Comorbidity Index remained stable. Both CM (r2 = 0.84 THA, 0.90 TKA) and PM (r2 = 0.75 THA, 0.84 TKA) were strongly negatively associated with LOS. CONCLUSION: Hospital charges and payments relative to surgeon charges and payments have increased substantially for THA and TKA despite stable patient complexity and decreasing LOS.

Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Is Associated With Increased Risks of Postoperative Complications Following Total Knee and Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) has not been studied as a potential risk factor for postoperative complications after primary total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Nearly 2000 patients with a diagnosis of NPH who underwent TKA or THA from 2005 to 2014 were identified in a national insurance database and compared to 10:1 matched controls using a logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: NPH was associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission, emergency room visit, and infection following TKA (odds ratio 1.48-2.70, all P < .01). NPH was associated with an increased risk of hospital readmission, emergency room visit, and dislocation following THA (odds ratio 2.40-2.50, all P < .01). NPH was also associated with significantly higher costs and hospital length of stay following both procedures. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of NPH is associated with an elevated risk of postoperative complications and increased resource utilization following TKA and THA.

Patients With Multiple Sclerosis are at Increased Risk for Postoperative Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. Patients with MS are living longer due to improved medical therapy and thus the demand for arthroplasty in this population will increase. The objective of this study is to evaluate MS as a potential risk factor for postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of MS who underwent THA or TKA from 2005 to 2014 were identified in a national insurance database. Rates of death, hospital readmission, emergency room visits, infection, revision, and dislocation (for THA) or stiffness (for TKA) were calculated, in addition to cost and length of stay. MS patients were then compared to a matched control population. RESULTS: In total, 3360 patients who underwent THA and 6436 patients who underwent TKA with a history of MS were identified and compared with 10:1 matched control cohorts without MS. The MS group for both TKA and THA had significantly higher incidences of hospital readmission (THA odds ratio [OR] 2.05, P < .001; TKA OR 1.99, P < .001), emergency room visits (THA OR 1.41, P < .001; TKA OR 1.66, P < .001), and infection (THA OR 1.35, P = .001; TKA OR 1.32, P < .001). MS patients who underwent THA had significantly higher rates of revision (OR 1.35, P = .001) and dislocation (OR 1.52, P < .001). Diagnosis of MS was also associated with significantly higher costs and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing both TKA and THA. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of MS is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications and higher costs following both THA and TKA.

Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Mortality Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery in Patients With Chronic Steroid Usage and Chronic Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective database analysis among Medicare beneficiaries OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chronic steroid use and chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and mortality in patients 65 years of age and older who were treated with lumbar spine fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Systemic immunosuppression and infection focus elsewhere in the body are considered risk factors for SSI. Chronic steroid use and previous MRSA infection have been associated with an increased risk of SSI in some surgical procedures, but their impact on the risk of infection and mortality after lumbar fusion surgery has not been studied in detail. METHODS: The PearlDiver insurance-based database (2005-2012) was queried to identify 360,005 patients over 65 years of age who had undergone lumbar spine fusion. Of these patients, those who had been taking oral glucocorticoids chronically and those with a history of chronic MRSA infection were identified. The rates of SSI and mortality in these two cohorts were compared with an age- and risk-factor matched control cohort and odds ratio (OR) was calculated. RESULTS: Chronic oral steroid use was associated with a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality [OR = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13-3.78, P = 0.018] and significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.33-1.92, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.01, P < 0.001). Chronic MRSA infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 6.99, 95% CI 5.61-9.91, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 24.0, 95%CI 22.20-28.46, P < 0.001) but did not significantly impact mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients over 65 years of age who are on chronic oral steroids or have a history of chronic MRSA infection are at a significantly increased risk of SSI following lumbar spine fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.